References, Affinities, and Resonances

This work does not belong to any school of philosophy nor to any established school of theoretical physics. It proceeds from an internal analysis of the structures required for a coherent world — space, time, matter, forces — to emerge from a minimal substrate. Certain ideas nevertheless encounter, through conceptual resonance, approaches previously explored in other frameworks of thought, without those having guided the work.

Conceptual foundations

The idea of a single substrate whose geometric properties determine the laws of the real may evoke certain holistic visions: coherence of the whole (Spinoza), primacy of process over object (Bergson), or event-based dynamics (Whitehead). Here, however, the objective is not metaphysical: it is to show how a minimal structure — Θ, Φ, local coherence — renders certain properties of space-time, matter, and forces unavoidable.

Theoretical physics

Correspondences exist with dissipative structures (Prigogine), evolutionary cosmologies (Smolin), relational formulations of space-time (Rovelli), or the idea of an implicate order (Bohm). The approach nevertheless differs profoundly: physics is not assumed; it is deduced. Fundamental constants, the stability of matter, gravitation, or atomic spectra appear as consequences of geometric constraints intrinsic to a discrete substrate (spations, invariant ρ·C ≈ kΦ, 6D→7D transitions).

Models of matter and space-time

The CdR framework aligns with certain intuitions from field theory, topology, theories with extra dimensions, or relational quantum mechanics — without adopting their postulates. The 6D vortex, Φ invariants, the emergence of material time, or spationic coherence form an alternative formalism: a unification by structure rather than by the juxtaposition of independent laws.

Space, time, matter, and forces are not givens;
they are structural solutions imposed by a coherent substrate.

Scientific methodology

The approach differs both from metaphysical speculation and from the classical experimental model: it aims to reconstruct laws from a minimal set of structural constraints. The central criterion is neither tradition nor authority: it is the internal necessity of the model and its capacity to produce falsifiable predictions (constants, masses, spectra, cosmic geometry).

What truly distinguishes this treatise

This work does not merely propose a new theoretical framework: it shows that, starting from a discrete and coherent substrate, the entirety of known physical structures emerges as a consequence. The singularity of the model lies in:

• the geometric derivation of constants;
• the emergence of space-time;
• the structure of matter as 6D vortices;
• the reinterpretation of gravitation as a coherence gradient;
• the continuity from matter → astrophysics → cosmology.

In other words: the laws of the world are not arbitrary; they derive from deep geometric constraints. It is this articulation — between fundamental structure and physical phenomena — that constitutes the principal contribution of this treatise.